|   
                    
                     
                  The 
                    lost work of Fred Forest or the 
                    lawsuit as pretext to artistic creation (1)  
                   
                   Harald SZEEMANN 
                    (by plane, January 1992) 
                  Theorician of art, promoter 
                    of exhibitions, co-director of the Kunsthalle of Zurich 
                  In art - and one knows 
                    it, among other things, by the practice and the nature of 
                    the artistic work engaged by Fred Forest - there are no certainties. 
                    There are no certainties to only one exception: everything 
                    that is exposed in a museum having passed the usual ritual 
                    (the museum invites the artist, the artist accepts or refusesĂ–) 
                    becomes Art! And this without distinction, it is a picture, 
                    a sculpture, a found object and signed, a tip of paper, a 
                    gram of radium put on the roof the Museum, drawings and texts 
                    of authors of the population invited by an artist. Just as 
                    a lot of pages of newspapers presented in a folder, a relation 
                    of communication under the shape of a postal packet put under 
                    way by an artist. In short, everything that exists and that 
                    had be chosen by an artist, all becomes art in the Museum. 
                    And because it is art, there is in this case: presentation, 
                    exhibition and maybe purchasingĂ– Even when it is about a temporary 
                    exhibition or the entry of the thing become art in the heritage, 
                    and therefore in the collections, there is always the responsibility 
                    of the museum institution that is engaged. Therefore, inventory, 
                    protection, conservation, restoration and especially the work 
                    must necessarily always to be covered by the insurances. 
                  To assure everything 
                    that he shows is one of the main duties of a director of museum 
                    or a promoter of exhibition. And even if the invited artist 
                    is often enemy of all bureaucracy, and manifests a holy horror 
                    to fill the contract that must represent the sum representing 
                    the objects to assure. But, if he had, instead of imposing 
                    his abuse of authority, accepted the demand legitimate of 
                    Forest to compensate him of the loss of his file with the 
                    drawings of the "others" ... maybe this one would not have 
                    created with his own pen, what he called "the lost work", 
                    a work constituted of about hundred original correspondences 
                    that articulate with different media and parodical actions 
                    that he led against the state of Vaud during several years. 
                    A way of "Research of the unknown Artwork" where Balzac flies 
                    to the help of our mediatic "desesperados". 
                  In conclusion: we will 
                    say that morally, ethically, juridically, Fred Forest has 
                    the right for him and the laughing; and he is right on the 
                    whole line in his fights of artist and his critical positioning 
                    against the representatives of the political and cultural 
                    power and the bureaucracy. The famous last word that ends 
                    the affair without appeals, and the end of no to receive of 
                    the political power, constitute in his case a characterized 
                    abuse, a loud injustice. We can consider that the political 
                    Power in this position is not even "nasty". He simply proves 
                    to be stupid! The proofs are obvious. The proofs are oppressive. 
                  Harald Szeemann, January 
                    1992  
                  Note  
                  - (I) media Action that 
                    took place between 1978 and 1991. To see "The lost work", 
                    edition Gallery Jacqueline Rivolta, Lausanne. 
                   ^  |